Introduction
As India’s Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman prepares to present the Union Budget on February 1, the country’s income tax authorities have issued a stark warning to Parliament: the government’s ability to track and tax cryptocurrency transactions is being severely undermined by fundamental enforcement challenges. In a presentation to the parliamentary standing committee on finance, officials highlighted how the borderless, pseudonymous nature of virtual digital assets creates significant gaps in tax recovery, signaling deep institutional discomfort with privately issued crypto assets like Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH) ahead of crucial budget decisions.
Key Points
- Tax authorities identified three major enforcement gaps: anonymous transfers, offshore exchanges, and jurisdictional limitations that make tax recovery nearly impossible.
- The government plans to implement AI and global data-sharing under the Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework to cross-match TDS data with income tax returns, issuing notices for discrepancies above $1,200.
- Industry experts warn that opposition without parallel regulation could push innovation, capital, and talent offshore, leaving India as merely a consumer and tax collector rather than a rule-setter in the crypto space.
The Core Enforcement Challenges: Anonymity, Offshore Havens, and Jurisdiction
India’s income tax department has pinpointed three critical obstacles that make detecting taxable crypto income and recovering dues “nearly impossible.” According to the presentation, the technology’s core features—anonymous transfers and pseudonymous addresses—allow transactions to occur outside regulated banking channels, creating a fundamental enforcement gap. Officials specifically cited the prevalence of offshore exchanges, which operate beyond the immediate reach of Indian authorities, as a major conduit for evading scrutiny.
Compounding this issue is a complex jurisdictional overlap in cross-border crypto activity. The tax department noted that while multiple countries may be involved in a transaction, enforcement reach remains limited, particularly when platforms operate overseas or remain unregistered with India’s Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU). A source familiar with the matter told Decrypt that “the Finance Ministry wants to curb decentralisation, privacy-focused systems, and offshore exchanges,” indicating a coordinated stance between the FIU and the Income Tax Department. This challenge persists despite existing heavy taxation, including a 30% flat tax on gains and a 1% Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) on every transaction.
Scrutiny Widens: From Laundering Reports to Exchange Irregularities
The government’s concerns extend beyond mere tax collection to encompass broader financial integrity and market conduct. Even FIU-registered exchanges are now facing increased scrutiny. This follows crypto-laundering reports that have been taken up by the Ministry of Home Affairs for detailed investigation. The Income Tax Department has also flagged specific irregularities by centralized exchanges, including alleged misuse of customer funds, the offering of extreme leverage, and incidents of insider trading.
This heightened vigilance is part of a broader institutional unease with virtual digital assets. Raj Kapoor, founder and CEO of the India Blockchain Alliance, interprets the tax department’s reported opposition as “a signal of India’s broader institutional discomfort with privately issued digital assets.” He argues that the current approach, characterized by stringent taxation and enforcement warnings without clear regulation, “does not amount to a coherent market framework; instead, it risks creating a climate of fear without delivering clarity, investor protection, or systemic oversight.” This sentiment echoes the government’s stated preference for an “RBI-guaranteed” digital currency over unbacked crypto assets, a position reinforced by Union Minister Piyush Goyal’s October comments that heavy taxation is intended to prevent users from being “stuck” with such assets.
Policy Response and the Looming Budget: AI, Audits, and Offshore Risks
In response to these enforcement gaps, authorities are deploying new technological tools and leveraging international cooperation. Officials announced plans to use Artificial Intelligence (AI) and global data-sharing mechanisms under the Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF). This system will cross-match TDS data collected from exchanges with filed income tax returns, with notices to be issued for discrepancies exceeding $1,200 (approximately ₹1 lakh). This tech-driven approach aims to pierce the veil of anonymity that has complicated tax enforcement.
Furthermore, the policy landscape has grown increasingly punitive. The 2025 Union Budget brought undisclosed crypto gains under Section 158B, enabling retrospective audits for up to 48 months and penalties as high as 70%. Despite these measures, the absence of a clear regulatory framework continues to weigh on domestic trading activity. As the Cabinet Committee on Parliamentary Affairs proposes February 1 for presenting the Union Budget 2026-27, the focus remains on control rather than structured oversight.
Industry experts warn of significant long-term consequences. Raj Kapoor highlights a critical policy risk: “sustained opposition without a parallel regulatory pathway will push innovation, capital, and talent offshore, leaving India as a consumer and tax collector of crypto activity rather than a rule-setter.” This warning underscores the central dilemma facing Indian policymakers as the budget session approaches: whether the current strategy of high taxation and enforcement warnings, without concomitant regulation, will secure the exchequer’s interests at the cost of India’s potential role in the future digital asset ecosystem.
📎 Related coverage from: decrypt.co
