Introduction
Asset manager VanEck has projected a staggering long-term valuation for Bitcoin, with a base-case scenario suggesting the cryptocurrency could reach nearly $2.9 million per coin by 2050. This forecast, detailed by Head of Digital Assets Research Matthew Sigel, hinges on Bitcoin’s structural adoption as a global settlement currency and a central bank reserve asset, framing it as a non-sovereign monetary instrument rather than a traditional equity. However, this multi-decade optimism starkly contrasts with near-term market fragility, where analysts like Matrixport point to declining volumes and weak capital inflows, highlighting a challenging tactical environment ahead for BTC.
Key Points
- VanEck's base-case projection assumes Bitcoin captures 5–10% of global trade settlement and 2.5% of central bank reserves by 2050.
- The firm's bull-case scenario sees Bitcoin reaching $53.4 million if it captures 20% of international trade and 10% of domestic GDP.
- Near-term market data shows declining volumes, muted new investor participation, and distribution by large holders, contrasting with the long-term adoption thesis.
The $2.9 Million Thesis: A Monetary Asset's Ascent
VanEck’s audacious projection is rooted in a fundamental re-evaluation of Bitcoin’s role in the global financial system. The firm’s 25-year capital market assumptions, as outlined by Matthew Sigel, treat BTC not as a corporate equity but as a “non-sovereign monetary asset.” This distinction is critical; it means traditional valuation models like discounted cash flow or price-to-earnings ratios are deemed irrelevant. Instead, VanEck’s analysis is built on Bitcoin’s potential penetration into two vast addressable markets: global trade settlement and official reserve assets held by central banks.
The base-case scenario posits that Bitcoin could capture 5% to 10% of global trade settlement and comprise 2.5% of central bank balance sheets as a reserve asset by 2050. Using a baseline price of approximately $88,000 as of December 31, 2025, to calculate implied growth, this adoption level translates to a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 15% between 2026 and 2050, culminating in a price of $2.9 million. This framework explicitly shifts the narrative from short-term price cycles to long-term monetary adoption, a thesis that underpins the firm’s bullish long-term call.
Bull, Bear, and Base: Framing the Spectrum of Risk
Recognizing the inherent uncertainty of a 25-year forecast, VanEck provided alternative scenarios to frame the risk spectrum. The bear case presents a starkly different outcome, where Bitcoin adoption stalls and fails to meaningfully penetrate either trade settlement or reserve assets. Under this scenario, the firm estimates a mere 2% CAGR, resulting in a price of roughly $130,000 by 2050—a figure that, while significantly higher than today’s prices, pales in comparison to the base case.
At the opposite extreme lies the bull-case scenario, a vision where Bitcoin rivals or even exceeds gold’s historical role. Here, VanEck envisions Bitcoin capturing 20% of international trade and 10% of domestic GDP. The resulting price projection is astronomical: approximately $53.4 million per BTC by 2050, implying a 29% annualized return. This scenario underscores the asymmetric potential VanEck sees in Bitcoin, where success in its core monetary thesis could lead to valuations that dwarf current expectations.
Near-Term Headwinds Clash with Long-Term Vision
While VanEck’s analysis paints a picture of multi-decade transformation, current market conditions present a more immediate and fragile reality. Analysis from firms like Matrixport suggests Bitcoin’s 2026 outlook is less about the dawn of a new macro cycle and more about “tactical” trading. The firm notes the crypto asset has entered a materially different regime than past early-cycle rebounds, with broader structural indicators still appearing unfavorable for a sustained bull market.
This near-term caution is validated by on-chain data and market metrics. Declining trading volumes, weakening capital inflows, and historical behavior following a break below the one-year moving average all point to a more selective and challenging environment. Critically, on-chain analysis shows large, experienced holders—often called “whales”—steadily distributing their supply. Concurrently, growth in new Bitcoin addresses and inflows into the network’s realized capitalization remain muted, indicating limited fresh capital and low participation from new investors. This creates a stark dichotomy: a long-term thesis built on mass adoption versus a present reality of distribution and cautious, tactical engagement.
📎 Related coverage from: cryptopotato.com
