France is threatening to block crypto firms licensed in other EU countries from operating domestically, citing concerns over lax regulatory standards. The move escalates a push for centralized EU oversight of digital assets under the MiCA framework. Regulators warn that inconsistent national practices could undermine market stability and investor protection.
- France, Italy, and Austria are advocating for ESMA to directly supervise major crypto firms to prevent regulatory fragmentation.
- MiCA's passporting system allows crypto firms to operate across the EU with a license from any member state, but national interpretations vary widely.
- ESMA has previously criticized Malta for shortcomings in its licensing process, underscoring concerns about inconsistent standards.
France's Regulatory Standoff with EU Crypto Passporting
France’s financial regulator, the Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF), has taken a bold stance against what it perceives as regulatory arbitrage within the European Union’s crypto landscape. Under the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) framework, companies can obtain a license in one member state and use it as a “passport” to operate across all 27 nations. However, AMF President Marie-Anne Barbat-Layani has expressed grave concerns that this system is being exploited by firms seeking jurisdictions with more lenient standards, thereby gaining quick entry into the vast EU market without uniform oversight.
Barbat-Layani’s warning is not merely rhetorical. She explicitly stated that France is prepared to deploy what she termed an “atomic weapon”—refusing to recognize licenses granted elsewhere in the EU. While she acknowledged the legal complexity and the negative signal such a move would send for the single market, she emphasized that it remains a possibility held in reserve. This stance underscores the deepening fissures in the EU’s attempt to harmonize crypto regulation, revealing a tension between national sovereignty and the need for cohesive, bloc-wide supervision.
The Push for Centralized EU Supervision
France is not alone in its call for stricter, centralized oversight. According to a position paper seen by Reuters, France has joined forces with Italy and Austria in advocating for the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) to directly supervise major crypto firms. These regulators argue that inconsistent national practices threaten to undermine investor protection and market stability, potentially exposing the EU to systemic risks from a rapidly growing, multi-trillion-dollar industry.
The push for ESMA to take a more hands-on role is rooted in the belief that a fragmented approach to MiCA implementation could lead to a “race to the bottom,” where countries compete to attract crypto businesses by offering the most favorable regulatory conditions. This, in turn, could dilute the overall integrity of the EU’s financial system. ESMA Chair Verena Ross has indicated openness to broader authority, but the proposal faces resistance from some member states keen on retaining national control over financial regulation.
Case Studies: Malta and Luxembourg Under Scrutiny
Specific jurisdictions have come under fire for their perceived laxity. Malta, one of the earliest adopters of comprehensive digital asset rules, was criticized by ESMA earlier this year for shortcomings in its licensing process. Similarly, Luxembourg has emerged as a favored destination for crypto firms seeking MiCA licenses, with major players like Coinbase securing authorization there. Gemini, another prominent exchange, obtained its license in Malta during the transition period, further highlighting the trend of firms gravitating toward certain jurisdictions.
These cases illustrate the practical challenges of MiCA’s passporting system. While designed to create a seamless single market, the framework has inadvertently exposed wide disparities in how national watchdogs interpret and enforce the rules. This has led to a situation where the quality of oversight varies significantly from one country to another, raising questions about the efficacy of a decentralized regulatory model for an inherently borderless industry like cryptocurrency.
Broader Implications for the Crypto Industry and EU Integration
The standoff between France and other EU members over crypto regulation has far-reaching implications. For the crypto industry, it introduces uncertainty about the future of market access within the EU. Firms that have invested heavily in obtaining licenses in perceived “lax” jurisdictions may find their operational freedom curtailed if countries like France follow through on their threats. This could lead to legal battles and a reevaluation of business strategies, potentially stifling innovation and growth in the short term.
For the EU itself, the debate touches on broader issues of integration and governance. The tension between national prerogatives and the need for centralized oversight is not unique to crypto but is amplified by the industry’s rapid evolution and global nature. How the EU resolves this conflict could set a precedent for other regions grappling with similar challenges. It also highlights the ongoing struggle to balance innovation with stability, a dilemma that regulators worldwide are increasingly forced to confront.
Ultimately, the outcome of this regulatory tug-of-war will shape the future of crypto in Europe. Whether through enhanced powers for ESMA, tighter MiCA rules, or unilateral actions by member states, the EU must find a way to ensure consistent, robust oversight without fragmenting its single market. The stakes are high, and the path forward will require careful negotiation and a shared commitment to safeguarding both innovation and stability.
📎 Related coverage from: cryptoslate.com